There’s a bit of a difference between immigrants and refugees though. One actively chooses to come for a better life, the other had no choice and has no devotion to the new country.
Both ways, there’s still a change in values that has to be learned which can be hard.
Sure, but refugees who don’t give a sh*t aren’t a good substitute for hard-working immigrants. You’re better off not having them. Sorry to have to say that.
Germany didn’t seem to be trying to up their population by accepting the refugees, though. I thought it was a humanitarian act which they are now regretting
They need to attract hard working people… Not just take in the masses.
So if they’re not attracting hard working people because they’re second tier, they’ve got a PR problem to fix. Or if they’re not motivating their refugees to commit to working,settling, and making a better life for themselves, they need to work on that.
Refugees can be immigrants, but they have to have a positive, work-ethic, “let’s build a better life” attitude.
In all seriousness, if they really want high quality immigrants, they could’ve started advertising in the US after Trump was elected. So many people said they wanted to leave–why not offer them citizenship?
Economic prosperity is more about production per person than number of people. People that can’t produce enough to survive drag everyone else down. They end up demanding higher taxes on productive people and more government handouts. The goal should be increasing GDP per person. Warren Buffet uses that as a measure. Who wants to have their standard of living lowered by more taxes to support a bunch of refugees?
All the EU countries are doing is adding people that’ll consume far more government resources than they ever pay in taxes.