Instead of spending 50k a year on private school parents should save that up over the years and donate to Harvard. Thatâd almost guarantee admission.
I still donât understand why college students are forced to study things not useful nor enjoyable. Is it a kind of brainwash or humbling to make them obedient?
I think itâs used for professorsâ selfish needs. They use those useless and hard courses to select a small number of top students to continue the research. By requiring everyone to take some useless courses, it create jobs for professors and their PhD students.
Thatâs a great question regarding the direction colleges should take. Historically, I think there was this idea that you should have a broad knowledge, so required courses cover English, HIstory, Math, and your own subject.
But is that really a good idea anymore? So many jobs require depth, not breadth. Google doesnât give one iota that you took a history course or a foreign language. (well, maybe the language)
Matrices in linear algebra are used heavily in computer graphics and game development, and graph theory is used in databases and computer program analysis.
Machine learning and AI use tons of probability & statistics, and MVC
Yeah - I never use Calculus in daily activity. Let alone linear algebra, DFQ, PDE, tor anything like that. However, Calculus was a prerequisite to really understand what is going on in Physics (as opposed to memorizing equations).
Further, I think there is a lot more to looking at education aside from just âwill I use this in my daily life?â Learning things that are tangential to daily life - like philosophy, MVC, history, soccer camp, quantum mechanics, tennis lessons, nuclear engineering, music theory, classical Japanese literature, piano lessons, Renaissance art history, etc etc ⌠I find all of these build an investment in character (as opposed to just spending money for nothing).
Learning all these things is a lifelong investment in inner character. Tangentially, I love going to CCSF in my spare time just to keep on learning new things which I never learned during my years of formal education.
a) Harvard is a good school but I also find it is only as good as what you make of it.
b) Rental income will pay for my childâs college, graduate school, and medical/law/post-doc/whatever education.
My gut says - having broad knowledge is more important than ever. An employer of course will want specialists in one field. However, there is more to life than working for an employer. What if one branches out and works for oneself in the future? What if one FIREs and decides to create their own company or do a mid-life career change?
A broad education helps open doors and helps develop empathy and EQ.
I absolutely would agree with requiring a business/entrepreneur course as a requirement for all majors. Art majors (yes you may have to open your own gallery), English majors (because you shouldâve realized youâll never make the money back teaching), CS majors (because you need to know how to raise VC funds, etc.
One can learn something from any experience. The trap that people fall into is that thinking that character-building-learning (like those experiences that you mention above) are directly translatable to specialist skills that are sought after by employers.
This is often not the case.
However, to assume that there is no value in the above experiences is to limit oneselfâs growth.