| Metro | Seasonally Adjusted Median Home Price January 2010 | Seasonally Adjusted Median Home Price October 2019 | Annual Median Home Price Percent Increase 2010 to Present | Annual Median Income Growth 2010 to Present | Percent Change in Homes for Sale 2010 to Present | Seasonally Adjusted Median Days on Market January 2010 | Seasonally Adjusted Median Days on Market October 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaheim, CA | $429,313 | $715,189 | 6.8% | 1.3% | -41.9% | 38 | 57 |
| Atlanta, GA | $123,600 | $251,011 | 10.6% | 1.0% | -51.9% | 73 | 35 |
| Austin, TX | $183,502 | $324,522 | 7.9% | 3.0% | -46.8% | 100 | 32 |
| Baltimore, MD | $238,667 | $282,014 | 1.9% | 2.0% | -39.8% | 69 | 39 |
| Boston, MA | $332,333 | $497,488 | 5.1% | 2.4% | -63.5% | 104 | 27 |
| Buffalo, NY | $114,458 | $159,530 | 4.0% | 2.0% | -39.7% | 107 | 22 |
| Chicago, IL | $183,824 | $251,026 | 3.7% | 1.2% | -44.0% | 79 | 46 |
| Cleveland, OH | $113,138 | $156,882 | 4.0% | 1.2% | -55.6% | 120 | 50 |
| Columbus, OH | $132,172 | $218,788 | 6.7% | 2.0% | -52.9% | 66 | 48 |
| Dallas, TX | $159,902 | $301,925 | 9.1% | 1.9% | -21.1% | 53 | 47 |
| Denver, CO | $202,896 | $424,051 | 11.2% | 2.8% | -63.4% | 58 | 20 |
| Fort Lauderdale, FL | $106,396 | $278,058 | 16.5% | 0.9% | n/a | n/a | 65 |
| Fort Worth, TX | $135,574 | $253,890 | 9.0% | 1.9% | -38.4% | 56 | 37 |
| Frederick, MD | $307,178 | $417,741 | 3.7% | 1.9% | -34.5% | 36 | 34 |
| Hartford, CT | $188,331 | $216,777 | 1.5% | 1.5% | n/a | 97 | 68 |
| Houston, TX | $156,987 | $245,471 | 5.8% | 2.0% | -10.3% | 58 | 46 |
| Indianapolis, IN | $112,317 | $192,658 | 7.3% | 0.9% | -73.3% | 99 | 18 |
| Jacksonville, FL | $142,878 | $241,872 | 7.1% | 1.0% | -40.2% | 118 | 49 |
| Kansas City, MO | $145,024 | $222,845 | 5.5% | 1.5% | n/a | 99 | 30 |
| Las Vegas, NV | $121,698 | $288,711 | 14.1% | -0.3% | -55.3% | 87 | 54 |
| Los Angeles, CA | $339,021 | $644,176 | 9.2% | 1.3% | -43.3% | 37 | 48 |
| Louisville, KY | $138,522 | $197,257 | 4.3% | 2.0% | -62.6% | 102 | 34 |
| Memphis, TN | $115,766 | $179,840 | 5.7% | 1.2% | n/a | n/a | 39 |
| Miami, FL | $152,577 | $313,811 | 10.8% | 0.9% | n/a | na | 72 |
| Minneapolis, MN | $163,480 | $282,804 | 7.5% | 1.9% | -59.0% | 68 | 28 |
| Montgomery County, PA | $280,407 | $319,166 | 1.4% | 1.4% | -46.7% | 87 | 41 |
| Nassau County, NY | $367,907 | $461,500 | 2.6% | 1.9% | -48.8% | 180 | 56 |
| New Brunswick, NJ | $294,011 | $330,815 | 1.3% | 1.9% | 52.2% | 120 | 55 |
| Oakland, CA | $335,722 | $743,678 | 12.5% | 3.2% | -60.0% | 20 | 20 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | $132,061 | $182,370 | 3.9% | 2.4% | n/a | 31 | |
| Orlando, FL | $114,369 | $259,723 | 13.0% | 0.5% | -61.7% | 104 | 32 |
| Philadelphia, PA | $152,151 | $210,857 | 4.0% | 1.4% | -45.0% | 59 | 42 |
| Phoenix, AZ | $129,613 | $286,319 | 12.4% | 0.8% | -54.5% | 37 | 41 |
| Pittsburgh, PA | $117,796 | $173,047 | 4.8% | 2.6% | n/a | 98 | 70 |
| Portland, OR | $241,702 | $407,920 | 7.1% | 2.6% | -52.4% | 94 | 28 |
| Providence, RI | $190,931 | $289,947 | 5.3% | 1.7% | -45.5% | 75 | 48 |
| Richmond, VA | $203,511 | $261,588 | 2.9% | 1.5% | -61.5% | 83 | 22 |
| Rochester, NY | $121,578 | $153,610 | 2.7% | 1.0% | -51.7% | 92 | 20 |
| Sacramento, CA | $207,891 | $413,333 | 10.1% | 1.0% | -66.5% | 46 | 20 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | $216,293 | $344,691 | 6.1% | 2.2% | -76.9% | 102 | 29 |
| San Antonio, TX | $148,679 | $236,375 | 6.0% | 2.1% | -13.0% | 63 | 48 |
| San Diego, CA | $320,663 | $592,662 | 8.7% | 1.7% | -59.3% | 30 | 27 |
| San Francisco, CA | $698,461 | $1,409,749 | 10.4% | 3.2% | -58.2% | 31 | 23 |
| San Jose, CA | $510,708 | $1,079,022 | 11.4% | 3.2% | -54.3% | 19 | 33 |
| Seattle, WA | $332,241 | $566,633 | 7.2% | 2.6% | -68.9% | 59 | 18 |
| Tampa, FL | $133,498 | $237,522 | 8.0% | 1.3% | -54.7% | 126 | 32 |
| Warren, MI | $88,959 | $218,172 | 14.9% | 1.1% | -5.8% | 49 | 26 |
| Washington, DC | $292,242 | $416,434 | 4.4% | 1.9% | -47.5% | 37 | 32 |
| West Palm Beach, FL | $159,556 | $285,832 | 8.1% | 0.9% | -18.7% | 147 | 76 |
@manch loves to post this kind of misleading stats. This kind of stats seduce you to extrapolate the past.
You don’t need to accept negative rental yields to get strong appreciation, and even the worst markets beat 2% annual inflation.
All data came from the past. Seems like you are against data? 
Feel free to add vague handwaving to justify your own bias though.
Put words in my mouth again? I am referring to the presentation! The presentation of data by the article is only descriptive but is of no actionable value. Tell me what can you learn from those stats and how can we take actions? The only thing I can action is thank you for posting those stats. And then forget about it.
The most interesting stat is the drop in inventory and DOM nationwide… bullish for future appreciation
1 Like