Housing was the world’s best investment over the last 150 years

Stocks will bring you highs, but periodically will seriously let you down. Treasury bonds will keep you safe, but they won’t make you rich. Housing? That’s the best of both worlds. In rich countries, over the very long term, housing investments get you returns similar to equities (like stocks and other securities), while providing the low volatility of bonds.

This is the argument of a groundbreaking new paper from economists at University of California-Davis, University of Bonn, and the Deutsche Bundesbank (the central bank of Germany). In a feat of extraordinary data collection, the researchers pulled together the annual returns of treasury bills, treasury bonds, equities, and residential housing from 1870 to 2015 for 16 now-rich countries such as the US, Germany, and Japan. The dataset is the first of its kind.

They find that, in the average wealthy country, the annual return on housing during that period was just over 7% when adjusted for inflation, while the return on equities was just under 7%. At the same time, the risk associated with housing was far lower. By standard measures of uncertainty, housing was about half as risky as equities, and slightly less risky than bonds.

2 Likes

God, trash can…

FWIW I remember an article from a couple of years ago that covered all the local billionaires in Singapore. and all but one made their money in real estate (regardless of the industry they originated in)

The ultimate investor, according to the study, would actually hold “an internationally diversified portfolio of real estate holdings, even more so than equities.

OK. I need to buy something overseas…

Population growth…

I got that covered, I own more RE in India than here :slight_smile: 20% YOY growth

2 Likes

OK, I will buy now and cash out 150 years from now. Oh wait…:grinning:

Just don’t rent it out. If you thought our tenant laws were bad…

My wife’s family lives in Johor Bahru in Malaysia. @hanera should be able to expound on this area that is somewhat close to Singapore. Supposedly booming with Chinese coming in… You buy there, I get you someone from family to manage…

Well, in India Big fish eats Small fish. you need to have a good political clout if you are heavily invested in RE, that is your insurance. There is no MLS and land records are just getting digitised. Lots of anarchy :slight_smile:

My dad is builder/developer since 1980s and involved with RE. We do lot of land, houses, apartments, the full circle of RE investing.

1 Like

Sound like another article pumping REIT. Some big REITs are about to be listed? Or REITs are stalling and need support?

Historical annualized return of S&P index is 7-11%, how is housing better? Sound about the same.
In fact, their charts also show return of housing and equities are about the same.

The advantage is the same return as stocks, but low volatility as the bond. If you count leverage, you would get 5 times return with a low volatility.

We can forget about stocks safely.

I don’t know. Even though the tax reform legislation favors REITs, my REIT has been down lately. My REIT does not seem to follow the market though.

I’m puzzled at the flat price of REIT. If real estate price is going up, REIT NAV should increase, so does the REIT price

Now we know you’re the richest. Net worth > ptieman’s?

2 Likes

Interestingly, this research has verified my long held observation. Did they copy my idea?

Yuuup, dang @RealEstatebull offer me a premium price on Fremont and it’s yours!!!

Schiller says different but he doesn’t understand the concept of location. Real Estate is totally location dependent. Image the changes in one urban location in 150 years…

My REIT ( VGSIX) was down 1.82% today. Trying to figure out if I should keep it or not.