Doesn’t the Sac AQMD have designated “no burn” days applicable to El Dorado Hills?
The “no burn” days in the Bay Area were a major reason I have two, out of service, pellet stoves.
I now have natural gas fireplace inserts. And the state is moving to ban those too!
I started, in the 1980s with a homemade, wood burning insert in my fireplace. Used to collect driftwood in the delta, cut it up and age it to burn.
Later, on to buying almond trees in orchards in East County that were being cleared for new housing developments. $15/tree. My neighbors and I shared trucks and chainsaws and did this as a group. We’d rent a log splitter and go from house to house splitting and stacking the almond. No more polluting that the farmers piling up the trees in the middle of the field and burning them in the fall.
Had to move to an EPA approved stove by the late 1980s. To comply with regulations.
Changed out to pellet stoves in the 1990s because of 'no burn" days that prohibited me from burning wood in a woodstove.
When they applied the “no burn” policies to pellet stoves, I changed again. To natural gas fireplace inserts.
Each of those steps cost me at least $1,000. But, the fuel source was still cheaper than PG&E provided, natural gas. And, I admit, I loved the ambiance.
Now, they’re trying to chase me out of the ng inserts too!
Several areas have banned fireplaces in new construction. I know people, Marinites no less, that have had their fireplaces removed from their homes in an effort to comply with what seems to be coming. And, some of these same areas have banned natural gas service at all in new construction lately.
I see what’s coming. And, it saddens me greatly that my granddaughter will never get to go camping and sit around the campfire at night and sing songs with all her freinds.
What just confounds me though, is reading and seeing pictures of home building and design magazines or online ideas about great fireplaces in homes today…in other states where none of this has happened!
I love you brave new world.