Frankly, just go back to customers only, nothing more or less. Just because that Phily incident got way out of hand did not mean Starbucks had to then throw out the baby with the water.
Playing the dumb as a drum.
“”“You know, if it gets a little boring, if I see people starting to sort of, maybe thinking about leaving, I can sort of tell the audience, I just say, ‘We will build the wall!’ and they go nuts.”""
I know some nuts on this forum.
Drain the swamp!
Hmmm. 10 months of gridlock and their economy starts doing better. Amazing that 18.9% unemployment is an improvement. It definitely makes you wonder about the value government is providing.
Sounds like Spain was so low that up was the only way. We on the other hand are at the top, so can we remain so?
I thought we also do best when there’s gridlock. Things should be good with the current situation.
Maybe we need to start having fines or prison time for journalist that print fake news. Freedom of the press doesn’t mean print whatever fake BS you want.
In other news, I’m absolutely shocked the MSM isn’t covering that the Convington kids have hired a lawyer to sue NYT for libel. Anyone who’s paid attention to that story learned how the MSM pushed their agenda regardless of facts. That’s not news reporting. It’s propaganda.
When someone like Mueller calls them out they have no choice but to take responsibility. The rest of the daily onslaught of lies and slander - almost never.
Check out “Campus Reform.” An organization worthy of support. They defend kids like these from the abuse in some cases physical beatings and threats they endure for expressing conservative views.
Wow. This is the guy that said killing a baby that survives an abortion attempt is perfectly acceptable. He even thinks it’s ok to leave the baby there alive while discussing it with the mother before killing it or just leaving it to die. Democrats cheered him for that. Clearly, the old yearbook photo is a much bigger issue than killing babies.
Just a couple of lessons on what happens when you let the government add a tax or fee.
The irony that people think universal healthcare would result in the government spending new tax revenues on healthcare. Didn’t we learn anything from social security and Medicare? They’ll design it to initially run a surplus. They’ll spend the surplus on whatever they want. Then later on we’ll be screwed since the money was spent. Voting to trust the government to manage universal care in our best interest is idiotic. We already have tons of local and federal examples of what happens to new revenues.