You may want to define risk clearly.
WB defines risk as risk of the company losing its moat & pricing power thus decreasing revenue and margin.
VOO is always the best 500 US companies, weak ones would be replaced So the risk for VOO is the risk of USA goes under or the group/ process for selecting the 500 is corrupted.
There are two things in stocks, one cost and another value. Cost (Price) what we pay, value is what we get. Value does not change day by day or hour by hour, by cost (price) changes any time as people are ready to pay Premium price than the value.
What WB and other says is watch out for price when it is coming below the value, buy that company.
In your example, if company value is represented by X-Axis, buying at green point is risky, but buying at blue point is safety which is what WB and Value investors do.
SP500 index isnāt meant to be the best companies. Itās meant to accurately represent the US economy. Thatās why the sector weighting changes as the economy changes. Itās also market cap weighted for each company. They arenāt using financial metrics (revenue growth, gross margin, return on equity, etc) to pick the best companies. They usually pick the biggest by market cap in each sector and fill in around them. It is a bet that the US economy will do well overall. Now itās more of a bet on the world economy, since over 50% of SP500 revenue is from outside the US.
Not sure to agree or not. However, what you said is accurate. Guess I have over extended my logic, but those are the best, if not second best, companies in their own sector.
Buffett argues that if you intend to hold an investment for a long time, it doesnāt make sense to measure risk by standard deviation. If youāre not going to sell your investments anytime soon, what prices do in the near term should have no bearing on risk.
Instead, Buffett makes the case that risk really comes from possible deterioration of business fundamentals.
Using sine waves to illustrate risk seem to be using standard deviation
Mismatching of value and price is not the risk WB is thinking of.
WB wonāt buy risky stocks.
WB wants to buy (not the risky one) stock at 30% margin of safety.
Donāt worry itās not going to be in that fund forever! Am waiting for a correction to move back in. Maybe 1/3 at 20% correction, 1/3 at 25%, 1/3 at 30%. Will probably drop further but Iām not looking to get the absolute bottom, at least for 401K.
I never liked any of the 401K options. Those web sites always give you failure warnings in case you bring a class action against the fund managerās incompetence. If I were you, in a down market Iād pick a fund with large blue chips and in a moderate/up market Iād pick small or mid cap. Never pick treasury bills - if you invest in those might as well put your money in a CD.
Instead of CDs or Treasury Bills, better to invest in some SP500 funds if 401k has the funds. For my 401k, my company and fidelity gives access to SDA (self directed account) where I can freely invest in any stocks, ETFs and Mutual Funds.
Maybe your companyās 401K plan has a lot of options but not every company has everything available. I donāt do 401K at all because my company doesnāt provide a matching and I get better returns investing on my own.
my eventual plan is to roll 401k into SD-IRA, but i donāt have enough there yet to do anything with sd-ira. maybe if btc drops to couple hundred dollars i can do something with it.