He is saying the GDP is measurement of output. But, China measures input. Output can be assumed to be equal to input but it will be misleading.
For example,
Economy 1 may start with $100, and end up with $150. Value added = 50
Economy 2 may start with $100 and end up with $50. Value destroyed = $50.
So, if input is used as measure, both economies are equal. If output is used as a measure, Economy 1 did better than economy2
If this is an assumption, it is wrong. True only if everything produced by box n-1 is input to box n. It does not account for consumption and value destruction along the chain.
If you didnât read his paper, why would you expect to understand?
Everyone likes to have their views confirmed. I am certainly no exception. However I care more about getting the reality right. Canât always win over humansâ natural cognitive biases but always willing to put in the efforts.
I will welcome this. It will be good for America. Too much power into greenbacks giving lot of lending power to FED resulting in currency distortion that we are experiencing. Hopefully, the money will be money again.
Are you sure? Without nations compel to hold greenbacks as reserve, Fed canât print $$$ like now without experiencing deflation, Trump canât have $T budget and no more sweatshops for USA. USA has been paying for real service/ products with paper from the printing press - literally just a piece of paper.
Exactly my point. I want the inefficient American business to quit the market. FEDS ability to print money has protected bad business for too long. The bad business should quit so that resources could be freed up for better utilization.