Austin MSA vs SFBA and TX vs CA

.

Did you get the aim of his tour? Is he going there to assess whether he can supercharge his career or looking for rental opportunity?

here = Austin MSA

Do land mass innovate? Or people do?

Anyway, if you like land area:

With 99,000 acres (155 square miles) across the area set aside as open and mixed public access parkland, the Tri-Valley accounts for 10 percent of the 1 million acres of protected land in the Bay Area.

Austin, the southernmost state capital of the contiguous 48 states, is located in Ā· Austin occupies a total area of 305.1 square miles (790.1 km2).

Austin has 2X the land area of Tri-Valley.

He was commenting on the types of people moving from Bay to Austin and I just put in my 2 cents.

Maybe you should have stayed in the Bay so your kids have better career opportunities and you have a much better environment to enjoy your senior years? Having rentals in one place doesn’t mean you have to live there.

.

That’s not my opinion. That’s @Jil’s opinion.

Austin :+1: Singapore :+1: :+1: Cupertino :-1: because of the cool :scream: and dry :scream: :scream: weather. Henderson of Las Vegas is a good retirement place too because of its :wink: weather.

Don’t recall you use this reasoning for Austin MSA vs Bay Area. Why not other metrics, discounting headstarts?

Austin currently has a heat index of 110 degrees, with an excessive heat warning and a red flag fire warning.

Sure, if you like it. Some people like to live on Mars too.

2 Likes

.

Glad you finally understand not everybody have the same choices and desires.

We can live in Mars already?

Not everybody has the same choices and desires, but some commonsense options are vastly more popular than others. Like good food and mild weather are almost universally desirable.

One reason why SF and SV have a huge moat against Austin. Why Austin is only comparable to 10% of Bay Area in terms of innovation.

By the way, one huge reason I stay here is because of my kids. They will have much better and more opportunities here in the future. If I live in say Texas my kids would be far less likely to move from Texas to CA. And if they moved I will see them far less often.

Nobody seems to have mentioned this multi-generational edge to living in the Bay.

From suitable environment for me to innovations?
Sometimes talk about rentals, sometimes talk about startups, sometimes talk… sound like random chitchat. Good, continue my TV watching :wink:

I’m not a city kind of guy but I’ve visited Albuquerque because it’s about 5 hours away and was really impressed with it. I’m sure it has dumpy areas I didn’t see but it has a vibrant downtown and tremendous natural history close by. Maybe not an economic powerhouse; maybe that’s why no one is considering it for rentals but it looked nice to me.

They are only growing 15%. Their profit margin is ~16%. That’s 31% combined which is below rule of 40. I’m curious how the market will react.

Am I reading the S1 correctly?
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579091/000119312523221345/d55348ds1.htm

They are profitable in the first 6 months of this year?

Yup. They are profitable. They should be profitable non-GAAP. Their GAAP profit will take a huge hit from stock based comp.

2 Likes

ā€œ Florida and Texas gain the most young high earners, while New York and California lose the most .ā€

The future is getting clearer and clearer. These are people 26-35 making over $200k/yr.

1 Like

This may be true but I really wonder how people live in Texas oven. Perhaps I won’t mind living there in the winter but no way I’ll waste my summers living there.

I guess the people moving there are the HENRY type with high earning but low net worth. So they are willing to sacrifice quality of life to build wealth.

1 Like

What percent of time do people actually spend outside?

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/u-s-study-shows-widening-disconnect-with-nature-and-potential-solutions

People spend more time commuting than they do outside.

What matters more to me is the number of high earners generated organically in each state. If CA stops producing high earners it’s in deep trouble. But if the goose keeps laying golden eggs and only a few thousand move to other states it’s not a huge problem.

1 Like

You should know the answer to this. California’s populate has boomed over the last 30 years. The number of people who have to pay state income tax hasn’t increased.