If location, location, location is #1 in our book…
Why not EPA then? It’s right on the peninsula. It’s just as convenient as PA. I bet in 20-30 years it’ll be completely gentrified. The current residents will get pushed out.
My office used to be in Alviso and I used to live in PA near 101. (a while ago though)
Although Alviso was undeveloped area I was not under the impression that it was unsafe (maybe I am wrong).
I used to take a walk to bayland with colleagues.
However, I always felt unsafe whenever I visited EPA.
Commute from PA to Alviso was not bad at all (probably 30 mins).
Bounded by creeks, sloughs, a river and Highway 237 — next to which sheep could be seen grazing only a few years ago — Alviso officially became part of San Jose in 1968.
Alviso, CA is on a flood plain, so development there is heavily restricted.
Key is here, I have often seen Alviso flooding with rain. More than one car height of rain is common.
1 Like
Ooooh, that is not good…
Well, we have over the years at least talked about EPA. I checked our posts and nothing on Alviso. It is not a secret anymore that if you were one of the more bolder ones back in the day you probably made out pretty well from EPA.
I was there. A fixer starts about 600K, often a tear down. A few blocks away I see the old Fortran Drive encroach toward shore line.
New Chicago is the left over of the swamp. It is near the taco roach coach when I see waste water bubbles. I almost throw up.
But every home on the market. They say walking distance to Cisco, 49 Stadium…