I would’ve preferred to get there sooner but if it does take another 7 years to get to my $100 million I would still be very happy nonetheless 
From a TSLA bull to trading other EVs?
He lost his mind
These people look like zombies….
.
They are TESLA Bots 
Tesla is officially a meme stock
Tesla is on track to become the stock that’s bought most often by everyday investors this year — surpassing even the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, which tracks the entire S&P 500 index.
FSD should be banned… They are all potentially driverless carbombs
.
for terrorists and the insane. cars have to be able to detect bombs and inflammable materials inside the car, otherwise they could potentially use as car bombs. This and other possible horrible things that can happen means I won’t ride driverless robotaxi… is why I think those cultists are too optimistic.
Thinking aloud: EM could declare himself as the ruler of the Earth or else… bear in mind, he control all the Teslas and Optimus.
They can be used like drones to deliver bombs anywhere.
Now you don’t a suicidal driver… just fill them full of explosives and send them wherever…
1 Like
.
Without that, Tesla could have probably run with the whole thing. It shows that the company is still staying true to its mission of accelerating the world’s transition to electric transport and renewable energy.
Speaking to Federal credits.
If its mission was to own the electric transport market, they might have not gone through with opening the Supercharger network – government incentives or not.
Not opening up is foolish because it would cost them huge sum of money if forced to go into a government-specified charging standard. Open up now would force government to adopt the Supercharger network as the standard.
If EM is foolish to say out loud that he wants to own the electric transport market, auto manufacturers would petition to stop Tesla to receive any federal credits. Other governments would put up obstacles to Tesla vehicles in their nations.
https://www.thestreet.com/technology/whats-stopping-tesla-from-achieving-level-3-self-driving
Interesting article. I am not sure if I believe in this analysis. This feels like a Mercedes marketing piece. It says the main thing holding FSD back is the lack of lidar, and the reason that is the problem is because the car does not have this lidar option as backup so it’s not able to achieve level 3 presumably due to regulatory requirements that a backup option must be there. It gives you the impression that FSD is already capable of self driving but held back only due to a technicality. 
This part is also interesting:
A Level Three system, which Mercedes-Benz (DDAIF) just started to roll out in the U.S., allows for conditional automation (hands off, eyes off). The conditions at this stage are specific and extremely limited; the outside environment must be clear and bright, the route must have been previously mapped by Mercedes, the car must be going less than 40 mph and there must be a car in front of the Mercedes.
So it requires a car in front of it in order to be at level 3. Didn’t know that. Doesn’t seem intuitive. So it can only follow but not be the first one in the fleet? It feels much less capable with this requirement than I previously thought.
2 Likes
.
Many critical services have strict regulatory requirements and some are subject to strict price control. Is why I don’t think is so easy for Tesla to dominate energy, auto, insurance, robotics, … market and make tons of money as what cultists think.
Interesting regulatory requirements 
Nothing to do with regulation. It’s where Mercedes feels comfortable taking legal liability. If anything bad happens, Mercedes takes up the liability.
Versus Tesla where it’s always the drivers’ faults. Days and nights.
