Austin MSA vs SFBA and TX vs CA

Aside from the whole CO2 / global warming issue (ICE definitely emits more CO2)

From particulate matters, ICE still emits more. Definitely catalytic converters have done a lot.

But brake dust still contributes to PM2.5. Not in EVs (90% reduction in brake usage).That by itself is a clear benefit.

Tires still need to improve so they produce less PM2.5

Actually, putting vehicles in tunnels would really help air quality…

1 Like

Since EV vs ICE is being discussed with regards to pollution, everybody should WFH permanently! :innocent:

3 Likes

Definitely that will help even more.

But truckers aren’t going to WFH :grin:

Tax airlines and cruise ships. Two large polluters that are not essential industries according to the covid19 bureaucrats.
As far as truckers… if you don’t like their pollution don’t buy
from Amazon and grow your own food. Don’t fly… no cruise ships

1 Like

People have done tons of studies on oil and the impacts. Then they hand wave and say EV is better without any thorough research. Something be different doesn’t mean it’s better. Less CO2 doesn’t mean it’s better overall.

I’m sure in 20 years there will be a movement about how bad batteries are, and how we need to eliminate them. Natural gas used to be considered a clean fuel that environmentalists approved. Once it became abundant and cheap they realized it would block development of solar and wind, so they flipped and decided natural gas was evil.

Solar is another one. All those panels will need dealt with in the future.

4 Likes

Nobody hand waved anything. You can read thru this report if you like. They compare the whole life cycles of ICE cars and EV.

This is just the snapshot of current technology. The dynamics is even more important. EV and batteries tech is on an exponential improvement trend line.

You don’t accept climate science. That’s why you don’t see the urgency to move away from fossil fuels.

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R46420.pdf

1 Like

Nothing to see at all.

“ In addition to a review of the literature, CRS focused on the results of one study in order to present an internally consistent example of an LCA. This specific study finds that the life cycle of selected lithium-ion BEVs emits, on average, an estimated 33% less GHGs, 61% less volatile organic compounds, 93% less carbon monoxide, 28% less nitrogen oxides, and 32% less black carbon than the life cycle of ICEVs in the United States. However, the life cycle of the selected lithium-ion BEVs emits, on average, an estimated 15% more fine particulate matter and 273% more sulfur oxides, largely due to battery production and the electricity generation source used to charge the vehicle batteries. Further, the life cycle of the selected lithium-ion BEVs consumes, on average, an estimated 29% less total energy resources and 37% less fossil fuel resources, but 56% more water resources. These results are global effects, based on the system boundaries and input assumptions of the study.”

People realize once we use water and it evaporates into the atmosphere then it’s a greenhouse gas, right? So it’s reducing one green house gas and replacing it with another.

Sulfur oxides kill plant life. Plant life is kind of important to survival.

Even the far left doesn’t believe climate science. It’s just their political platform to destroy capitalism. The guy who wrote the new green deal for AOC literally admitted it wasn’t about the environment at all, and it’s about destroying capitalism.

2 Likes

Key point is to compare the total footprint and their effect on climate, taken as a whole. EV is miles ahead of ICE, and it’s just the current generation of EV tech.

If you don’t accept science we are just talking about political ideologies and religious beliefs. No more need for discussion.

No clue how you derive that conclusion from the quoted paragraph. That’s the exact hand waving I meant.

I’m not sure if you deny they edit the data over and over or just don’t care. Scientists don’t edit data over and over to get the conclusion their being paid to find. The data should speak for itself. Turning a blind eye to it is literally the peak of religion over science.

Lol. The report is 41 pages long and has more than one cherry picked paragraph.

Do you deny the temp data is edited repeated or do you not care?

That’s just sign of rapid progress in the field. People tried to deduce from circumstantial evidence. Nobody had a thermometer 10,000 years ago.

What’s wrong?

They are editing the data for years since 1975 over and over. Just google nasa editing temperature data.

Well. it does not seem he beleive in American engineering talent. we will be more and more depend on Europe. plus climate restriction will further raise utlitiy prices. Profound impact on Energy and whats left of manufacturing. This grid thing will be Texas undoing. Even Musk will flee.

Watch out for frozen wieners in Austin. When I was 6 Oscar wiener trucks were the coolest thing ever. I remember onedriving by my house. I jumped and fell still have the scar. I want one in my garage

.

2 Likes

Gotta love Texas’ free markets. Hey, at least they offer payment plans.

As Texas deep freeze subsides, some households now face electricity bills as high as $10,000

$10k in a few days while others are reporting it doubled? That seems fishy and is probably BS. Notice they didn’t say they reviewed any documents for that one. It’s just a little mention at the very end of the article but is the headline. Clickbait.

1 Like

Texas allow fixed rate or market rate (aka time of use) plan. Mine is a fixed rate plan.
I didn’t have an electricity provider, instead, join a non-profit co-op who would scout for the competitive price source. At the end of the financial year, if revenue is more than expenses, they would re-invest those excess + return a little to members :wink:

those high prices of Texas coming to California.
what is more cost effective for PG&G. getting bills from a Apartment complex or spread out population in single family homes t with line losses and need more workers to service faults?
there is de-industrializaiton, working from home and general office and small business closing. so the big revenue sources are evaporating. and PG&E is not going to cut salaries or there cost structure.

In times of extreme supply stress people need to cut back as much as possible to avoid an even worse systemic collapse that leaves more to freeze to death in their homes while others weather the storm comfortably. Market pricing is one way to achieve this. Confine yourself to a single room, cover the floor with something insulating - dirty laundry if that’s all you’ve got - and seal door gaps and windows as best you can. Or - pay through the nose.