Good, you answer your own question. It directly affect RE. Now canāt do Open House and private showing. So canāt sell your house or rent out your house. One of my Austin rental will be on the market from end Mar, now canāt do showing because of shelter-in-place.
A few mins later: Americans love politics. Is not reasonable to expect them not to inject some political views into any topics/ threads. Just donāt get too worked up if people donāt agree with you.
You need to stop listening to the trump informercial briefings. The studies on Chloroquine is mixed. A number of studies show they have no effect. The current treatment that everyone uses for covid is treating symptoms. You need ventilators to help people breathe. Donāt grasp at straws and be misled like trump
Are they restricting these drugs to prevent a run on them in case they are useful? Or are they restricting them to prevent consumer harm? Seems like the former.
So i read the article. the order passed by the Governor is based on the recommendation of the pharmacy group of Nevada and only prevents OTC use in a non-prescribed setting and allows for use in the hospital. So no banning like @pandeyathotmail suggests.
The point is that all this is a political stunt by Nevada governor because the drug in question is not an OTC drug as far as far as I know. Or it was available OTC before this banning order?
This drug is essential to treat people who need it for specific diseases. If you donāt limit it, it will go the way of toilet paper as anyone that is misled and thinks itās a holy grail cure will hoard it like toilet paper. The governerās action is very correct. Limit it to people who need it (with a prescription), allow hospitals to use it as they see fit. This prevents hoarding and ensures those who need it can get it.
It is still a political stunt because it was never available without prescription in the first place. So hoarding was never possible. What is the point you are trying to make?
Chloroquine and proguanil is available as an over the counter medicine from your pharmacy, so you donāt need to see a doctor for a prescription in order to be able to buy it.
This is strange. So, something was good to be available as OTC until yesterday, and all of the sudden a governor decides it is not. Interesting, is it not?
I am getting an impression that āunproven medicineā is saving people and doctors are prescribing it.
Are people dying by taking this medicine. Should have FDA not approved it? What worries you?
Did you read? the medicine is essential for treatment of people with conditions that need it. the hype made people that dont need it hoard the medication impacting the lives of people that currently have those prescriptions and are unable to get it.
It is a choice the doctors and the patients have to make. Should the medicine be given first to corona virus patients how might be fighting for life, or those for other treatments that can wait.
Why do governors have to interfere into private decision between patients and the doctors. It is so unamerican and it is beyond me.
I am not sure if you are purposely mis understanding. The only example of a governor ābanningā something that you showed was wrong. It was a purposeful mistatement of what was done. In that case, the governor was following the advice of the state (Nevada) medical bodies to limit the use to those with prescriptions and hospitals. Not any random person hoarding it because Trump said it was a cure. Of course right wing news and Fox news takes what is something a governor followed with advice from medical professionals to ensure those who need it (for corona virus or anything else), to be a ābanā. Anyway my last post on this, because it sounds like you really dont want to listen/learn and just want to repeat right wing talking points
Wait. I thought the medicine was toxic. Itās supposedly so dangerous we shouldnāt use it for coronavirus. Those things it is used to treat must be pretty bad if a toxic treatment is the best option.