How did they erase her from the internet? Usually google keeps cached pages for a really long time. It seems they’d have to convince google to erase all of that.
And that’s relevant how? Some good old slut shaming?
What’s the practical implication? Should we have a higher barrier of proof just because the accused is powerful?
Ford is openly anti-Trump, which is okay. However, she never filed a complaint about her sexual assault in high-school, until thirty-some years later when Trump nominated Kavanaugh.
Then she did not go to the law enforcement, but went to the politicians that hold the Confirmation Hearing to file an accusation.
Hmm.
Wait a minute, from this thread (didn’t bother to verify with other sources), she is a psychology professor?
Republicans are known to be morally corrupted. Democrats are not that far behind either though. That’s why more and more don’t have any party affiliations.
Who are not morally corrupted please raise your hand.
No. The implication is that people will make up stuff to take down powerful people. How would you feel if some accused one of your family members of sexual assault 35 years ago with the evidence that’s been presented? Would you be so eager to take them down and ruin their career?
I may soon be financially bankrupt though if FB didn’t shape up soon.
I will repeat what I said before. As of now I only saw two people testified under oath on this matter. Ford answered all her questions. BK was evasive and visibly angry.
I would like to see a thorough investigation on this matter, without GOP’s thumb on the scale.
I know right? Please don’t tell me this is a joke.
2.) She now works as a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University. Her job has led her to being widely published in various academic journals.
Read more at: https://theamericanbarber.tv/2018/09/16/who-is-christine-blakey-ford-facts-on-woman-accusing-brett-kavanaugh-hollywood-life/
False or true?
Never verified the sources but it’s probably true. Dark days in academia.
That is why the post from @netaxcat with the analysis by body language experts was on point. Ford had a game plan on how she was going to answer. The game is fixed!!!
So you don’t count the sworn statements of the 3 now 4 alleged witnesses? Why don’t those count? Do you not believe they exist? Do you not believe them, since they don’t support the outcome you want?
Kavanaugh was frequently “belligerent and aggressive” after drinking and had lied to senators about his experience with alcohol, Ludington said in a statement released to the news media Sunday. The barroom fisticuffs were the most searing example of Kavanaugh’s behavior he remembers, Ludington said in an interview with Bloomberg News, where he expanded on his statement for the first time.
“It was sort of a general feature of hanging out with Brett in college,” he said in an interview. “When you’re having beers on a Friday or Saturday night, that was kind of Brett’s shtick. He was aggressive. He was belligerent.”
Great picture by the way. Captured the male rage perfectly.
I am not surprised people may not remember some random parties more than 30 years ago. Why is that surprising?
Maybe BK should take a lie detector test. That would help clear his name if he really didn’t do anything.
Uh, relevance? Just because he got into some bar fights does not mean he sexually assaulted someone…