Not a financial decision. For extended family. Does not make sense. But there are plenty of $10m homes in Woodside. For $2m you can only get a modest home a few miles away in Redwood City. BTW Woodside is trying to get around SB9 by declaring it a mountain lion sanctuary.
Submit âdemolish and rebuildâ plans for a 3 story 7 plex with zero parking to replace the home now on the lot. Doesnât mean you have to build, just that you intend to. Also, be sure to CC the legislator and every neighbor within a 1,000 ft radius of your plans.
Watch how fast NIMBY resistance builds and SB9 gets rolled back.
Iâm sure folks in Woodside and pretty much any city under pressure from SB9 could pony up $500k to buy properties next to these kind folks trying to force everyone else to build when they donât want to - or canât, in the case of Huntington Beach here in SoCal. Because there is zero available surplus land in and around HB and weâre at peak density to begin with, the City is going full hand to hand combat against the State on SB9 issues. Hopefully they will prevail.
The real issue is the cost of construction. ADUs can cost from $300-1200 per sf. Not affordable. The State has a hard time building affordable housing for $750/sf. Affordable housing is cruel joke
How do builders pull off new construction at ~$300/sqft an hour away from the Bay Area? I would love to take a shot at a major expansion or even a remodel but it doesnât make financial sense at â„ $750/sqft.
Thatâs not surprising. I wonder if someone else will try to buy the land to develop it. 80 acres is a ton of land thatâs close to downtown and Diridon station.
Back in 2000 AAPL agreed to buy acres of land in south San Jose, project shelved after downturn, then permanently shelved.
Same way, year 2008 Cisco agreed to buy multi acres land same place, project shelved after 2009 downturn.
Now, if Google shelves the project, with WFH policy expansion will likely be shelved permanently.
In such case, even if 40% discount, no use of buying as SJC downtown area is high crime location. IMO, It is not attractive anymore or less attractive.
Construction costs fees and regulations keep making new construction much higher going forward. Supply is permanently restricted and demand keeps increasing. I have had no problem raising rents in Tahoe. Downtowns in the BA have encouraged homelessness and crime through liberal politics and appeasement. Other areas will benefit from this.