This seems like a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t look like it has enough teeth to compel the people who need help to receive help. It’s hard to imagine those folks to voluntarily receive treatment/medication and be cool about the whole process. If this would just work then these people probably don’t need help in the first place.
2 Likes
1 Like
The SF government is smart. They “contain” the majority of the homeless issues within Tenderloin so residents of the rest of the city like manch can continue to show compassion to homeless from a distance. 
What shortage. Bay Area population declined by 6% in last 2 years. Its lie perpetrated by RE mafia.
1 Like
1 Like
How does that happen when people didn’t even have to pay rent, and there was an eviction moratorium?
1 Like
You have to ensure sufficient sanctioned homeless encampments before you can ban unsanctioned.
Wow. That’s a HUGE change for Portland.
2 Likes
Seattle is finally dealing with the issue. They’ve cleaned up 4 encampments along I-5. They’re clearly reading the political tea leaves and making a push before the election.
3 Likes
2 Likes
So now we can finally blame liberals for the homeless problem. They are the ones setting the zoning laws and building codes in areas without enough housing. All the claims of wanting to help are just political posturing while their actions make the situation worse.
Liberals are the root cause of most problems in the USA, be it homelessness, lawlessness, illegal immigration, declining demographics, drug addiction, bla bla.
It is time to rid SF if the homeless menace. They have more rights than law abiding citizens and are are threat to everyone and to life and safety.