
Webb受累股災 首季蝕1.8億 「近恐慌高峯 近日增持股票」
美國聯儲局在兩周內突然兩度減息,為環球強力救市及緊急釋放流動性拉開序幕。一些先知先覺的投資者已嗅到血腥味,在環球救市初期選擇沽貨走人;以港股為例,由月初至今累跌近13%,美股道指則跌約一萬點。 流動性問題困擾股市 首季加注信星明輝等
This is where it’s hard to know without knowing their full portfolio. They could just be selling OTM to create some yield. Maybe they do think it’ll rebound. It wouldn’t take much of a short-term bounce to move the price of them. We don’t need to get to those levels to make a profit. Time decay is really going against them though.
Fed will never run out of ammunition.
I liked it. I am very pleased that the market does not want to go down more even in the absence of a pssed stimulus package. (or they know it will get passed eventually).
You can only steal from someone if one has something of value that can be stolen.
This is where it’s hard to know without knowing their full portfolio. They could just be selling OTM to create some yield. Maybe they do think it’ll rebound. It wouldn’t take much of a short-term bounce to move the price of them. We don’t need to get to those levels to make a profit. Time decay is really going against them though.
Time decay is really going against them though. => With all these, they are ready to through $3M. How much they would have thought/analyzed, not an easy task even if he has $100M in cash.
IMO, no one must follow others, but analyze individually whether the stocks are at deep discount level or not. It is their money, they can through away at any time.
Even I do follow Warren Buffet and few others, but those are proven leaders on market. It is my risk to follow these leaders.
Second, no one will show openly their portfolio, not good the portfolio.
Here is my view, but do not consider this promoting buy or sell ideas. Anything I say here can be 100% wrong !
With all these, market is going down is wrongly pricing it.
My rule: When fundamentals are looking positive, market is mis-pricing the equities, is an anomaly, and it gives me advantage of buying at low price. I did buy GOOGL and AMZN when market priced them wrongly. Similar to it, now market is pricing wrongly with lot of positive fundamentals.
If they are selling covered calls, they just pocketed $3M for calls that aren’t likely to be hit.
If they are selling covered calls, they just pocketed $3M for calls that aren’t likely to be hit.
Good guess , but covered call means selling the calls, not buying it right.
Risk is entire net worth thrown away when market goes up and exercised it and owner needs to pay hefty tax on sale !
Normally, people will buy productive puts, not covered calls during this volatile period.
David Webb, a famous investor in Hong Kong, has been bottom fishing. I can only find Chinese source.
美國聯儲局在兩周內突然兩度減息,為環球強力救市及緊急釋放流動性拉開序幕。一些先知先覺的投資者已嗅到血腥味,在環球救市初期選擇沽貨走人;以港股為例,由月初至今累跌近13%,美股道指則跌約一萬點。 流動性問題困擾股市 首季加注信星明輝等
Fed will never run out of ammunition.
Well let see what’s better than QE to infinity.
There’s always a buyer and seller for each transaction. I doubt they can even tell if it was the same person.
There’s always a buyer and seller for each transaction. I doubt they can even tell if it was the same person.
Sure,I agree, but I am pointing the buyer…who is seeing positive growth on stocks, risking $3M
Well let see what’s better than QE to infinity.
Ever heard of the trillion dollar coins?
Also Fed is only buying bonds now, and high grade ones. They could lower the grade req. Bank of Japan actually directly bought stocks if I remember right. Wait until Fed buys FAANG stocks.
Also Fed is only buying bonds now, and high grade ones. They could lower the grade req. Bank of Japan actually directly bought stocks if I remember right. Wait until Fed buys FAANG stocks.
BBB is close to junk status. And let’s not talk about what happened to Japan.
Here is another Professional HedgeFunds Billionarre buying stocks. Billionaire investor Bill Ackman is an “aggressive buyer” of stocks as the coronavirus pandemic bleeds markets, having bought “around $2 billion worth of equities” in the last ten days. A 'very bullish' Bill Ackman is an 'aggressive buyer' of stocks in coronavirus panic
See finviz insider trading for NRZ, all the directors bought 10000 shares each at $5.x range on Mar 18 & 19th !
I just bought some IVR around $5.x, it has 0.50 dividend so far not revoked yet.
The Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.50 per share of common stock for the first quarter of 2020. The dividend will be paid on April 28, 2020 to stockholders of record on March 30, 2020, with an ex-dividend date of March 27, 2020.
/PRNewswire/ -- Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (NYSE: IVR) today announced that its Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends on shares of its common...
Let us see how it goes. IMO, expecting real estate issues at par with 2008 downturn, these equities are corrected 68%, but I think correction is way over done than actual. Only time will tell us what is right !
I have got this suggestion, as per picture, but would like to review the situation, if I assume market is going up to S&P 2700-2800 by May-Jun 2020
Okay, I risk my money, no issues, first two options ready to lose 100% cost. The last two are fine, but expensive, but first two are cheaper, Based on these, @hanera review which is better?
I have few scenarios, let me know which is better? I know 3 & 4 are expensive, but would like to know which is best you will choose?
PUT (VIX) CBOE MKT VOLATILITY MAY 20 20 $20 for 20 cents/option
CALL (SPY) SPDR S&P500 ETF JUL 17 20 $300 for 84 cents/option
LEAP CALL (SPY) SPDR S&P500 ETF DEC 16 22 $250 for $24/option
LEAP CALL (SPY) SPDR S&P500 ETF DEC 16 22 $225 for $35/option
President Donald Trump said Monday that he wants to reopen the country for business in weeks, not months, and he claimed, without evidence, that continued closures could result in more deaths than the coronavirus pandemic.
Prep your mask or die with money
Get rich or die tryin
Based on these, @hanera review which is better?
The bloggers in the image are pretty good.
Frankly I don’t follow VIX or SPY at all.
Thought you can use the trading platform to analyze?
Ventas CEO Debra Cafaro cites a "strong financial condition," importance of the dividend in its board's decision to declare its normal dividend, despite challenges during coronavirus outbreak.