San Francisco: City of World Class Filth


#201

No, don’t. He has a rat :joy:


#202

you should show your love and caring by giving the homeless a grand so they can buy more drugs. He’s not happy because he got no money to buy drugs, you should have help him.


#203

They do drugs under the slide while there are kids in the playground. The poor mom was terrified and took her kid and left. I took video and called 911. That’s when they got pissed and tried to claim it was “just pot”. The cops here are so useless they never showed. The threat of the cops was enough to make them leave though. The park is literally surrounded by luxury apartment buildings where 1-bedrooms start at $2,500/mo.


#204

Deviant behavior should not be tolerated in public spaces in Seattle or SF


#205

Progressive cities are very tolerant.


#206

Yes… and that tolerance is driving SF into the ground. I’ve always been perplexed at how “progressive” and “progress” seem to be so very opposite.


#207

Don’t listen to the negativity of the people on this forum. San Francisco has never been better. Owning a house in SF has never been better.


#208

Wow. It must have been hell before then. Because it’s the most disgusting city I’ve ever been to with homeless people that are creepy, crazy, and refuse to leave you alone unlike any other city I’ve been in.


#209

Really. Sorry to hear about that… :rofl:


#210

Damn, straight… how much money did your house go up in the last 5 minutes, @wuqijun???


#211

I’ve lost track… :rofl:


#212

Liberals prove the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Too bad most of you never saw SF before 1967. That great city was destroyed by the hippy invasion and progressive politics. The rush to tolerance of every deviant lifestyle has driven families out. Now SF has fewer children per capita of any city in America.


#213

That’s a sign of wealth. Third world cities is where people breed like rabbits…


#214

That’s the sign of a dying culture.


#215

Not at all. You are probably talking about Detroit.


#216

It is low, but how low? Low enough that you dont see any kid around?

Suburbs are much better for kids, imho.


#217

Plenty of kids. Don’t feed into their negativity.


#218

Im not, but sf doesnt look good enough for kids imho :slight_smile: a kid should be able to ride his bike blocks and blocks in safety. They should be able to play games in a no traffic/culdesac street.


#219

They can, in my SF neighborhood.


#220

We will see for how long.